http://nosugrefneb.org/1921 (benferguson) Sat, 24 Dec 2011 11:56:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 http://nosugrefneb.org/1921#comment-8989 nosugrefneb Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:17:35 +0000 http://nosugrefneb.com/?p=1921#comment-8989 <p>Yes...the umlaut diacritic comprises the dots, not the letter itself. My apologies for the confusion regarding Germanic language usage.</p> Yes…the umlaut diacritic comprises the dots, not the letter itself. My apologies for the confusion regarding Germanic language usage.

]]> http://nosugrefneb.org/1921#comment-8988 Matt Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:19:34 +0000 http://nosugrefneb.com/?p=1921#comment-8988 <p>ö is technically not an "o" with an umlaut. Linguistically, it's part of "Dansk Tunga," part of the Germanic Languages family. The "ö" is it's own letter coming at the tail-end of the Swedish/Norwegian/Danish alphabet... Not that it's important, but it's an interesting enough fact, I felt I had to share.</p> ö is technically not an “o” with an umlaut. Linguistically, it's part of “Dansk Tunga,” part of the Germanic Languages family. The “ö” is it's own letter coming at the tail-end of the Swedish/Norwegian/Danish alphabet… Not that it's important, but it's an interesting enough fact, I felt I had to share.

]]>